Well, you guys can flame me all you want, but I don't have a problem with what anybody, including Barrett-Jackson or the consignor, is doing. I think I called it pretty well a few pages back.
No one knows for sure at this point what the original set of numbers were of the car that carried Kennedy, outside of the number stenciled on the door. No one outside of our group knows who Steve Lichtman is, or what his character is. The information from the library has just come out in the last couple days, and regardless of what PCS members WANT to believe, it is still suspect to the general public. I believe if we keep after this that might change, and newer or better information may come to light about the crushed car.
But the fact of the matter is that hasn't happened YET, so it's not fair to cheat the consignor based on information that people think is out there, but isn't...YET.
I agree there were some snarky remarks and attitude in the press conference, but I am still able to see this story from both sides of the coin, and based on all the evidence I have seen so far I think they have done the right thing by letting the public (meaning everyone in the world who knows nothing or cares nothing about the pro-car community) know that there is an opposing viewpoint and that there is some doubt about the provenance of the car, and with that being said, buyer make up their own mind. They really can't just pull the car without an abundance of evidence that the car is a fake, and until someone proves otherwise they have stronger evidence in their corner.
I realize there are photographs of a car being crushed, and having talked to Steve Lichtman and everyone else here I know the kind of integrity the PCS has, and I want to believe that was the real car. But to the non-PCS world the evidence isn't there to 100% say that was the real car. I wish it were, I wish there were more, but at this point there isn't, and with all the other controversy surrounding all other aspects of the Kennedy assassination it is easy for people to say that there may have been a decoy car, that the wrong car was crushed, etc.
So the short version is there is a car out there that has some pretty strong documentation that it was the real car, and there are photos of another car that appears to be the real car getting crushed. I believe all those facts have been presented to the general public, and they are free to make their own decision. I don't feel anyone is being deceived at this point, like I did earlier on.
I said earlier on that, while Steve Lichtman is a respected and trusted friend of ours, nobody outside of our community knows who he is, and that will weigh into the assessment of the facts. It looks like it has so far. I also said a while back (albeit in a joking manner) that the picture of the car being crushed didn't actually show it being crushed, just in a crusher, and that post was pulled because people thought I was playing devils advocate too much and it tarnished the reputation of the PCS, but you wait and see, I can almost gaurantee before this is all over somebody somewhere will go down that road in all seriousness. I'm hoping more information comes from the library, and I hope the first thing is a pictureof that car 8 inches tall, preferably with the numbers on the tailgate still showing, but without documentation refering to the serial numbers and VIN numbers obtained independent of the seller of the vehicle, I don't think we'll ever know the truth.